Latest Posts in Aishwarya Somal Category

Emerson Migration Law Director Aishwarya Somal Admits

Aishwarya Somal

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Aishwarya Somal”, at address “Emerson Migration Lawyers, Level 8, Northpoint Building, 231 North Quay Brisbane Qld 4000. Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$18,849,800.00 (eighteen million, eight hundred and forty nine thousand and eight hundred AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, breached the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, conspired against me, was an accessory after the fact, has committed extortion and professional misconduct.

The Tortfeasor and her collegues, Myles Walker and Gavin Lai, withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents from me which was proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me. The Tortfeasor conspired with the other side and the family law judge, to keep this information from me.

The Tortfeasor refuses to put right the actions of her colleagues, even though I explained with documents to prove to her the crimes they had committed against me.

The Tortfeasor sent me an extortionate invoice for work I did not approve and then threatened me with legal action if I did not pay her. The bill is still outstanding and she has refused to give me my case file.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain and cause a loss to me by hiding the fraud committed against me. This was so that the other side could continue with the fraud of falsifying documents concerning the sale of my property.

The Tortfeasor, by hiding information, assisted with the property scam, where I was forced and blackmailed into selling my marital home for well under the market value. This is a criminal syndicate which includes judiciaries, bankers, valuers, REIQ members, where they use the corrupt family law courts with the corrupt family law judge, who plays a major role in gaining properties for much less than their worth. The perpetrators take advantage of the collapse of the family unit, by means of threatening court action and fees if I did not agree to an unfair settlement and sale of my property.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved

Latest Posts in Animal Farming Category

Animal World

Animal Farming, Property

CLOSE SLAUGHTERHOUSES — CREATE SANCTUARIES
A Call for Compassion, Conscience and a New Relationship with Animals

We are calling for a fundamental change in the way humanity treats sentient life.

I recently watched footage of the slaughter of young cattle. What I witnessed was profoundly distressing: vulnerable, sentient animals experiencing fear, distress and suffering in an environment from which they had no possibility of escape.

These were not objects.

They were living beings.

They felt fear.
They felt pain.
They wanted to live.

And yet we have created a system in which their lives can become a means of production and profit, before ending in slaughter.

WE MUST ASK OURSELVES: IS THIS WHO WE WANT TO BE?

A society should be judged not only by how it treats the powerful, but by how it treats those who are completely dependent upon its protection.

Animals placed into human care trust us to protect them.

If we say that we love animals, yet ultimately send them to slaughter, we must have the courage to examine that contradiction.

There is another way.

FROM FARMS TO SANCTUARIES

We should begin creating a genuine pathway for farmers to transition away from animal slaughter and towards sanctuary farming, plant-based agriculture and compassionate land stewardship.

Farmers should be supported—not abandoned—to make this transition.

Land can produce food without requiring animals to be raised and killed.

Farms can become sanctuaries.

Animals can be allowed to live out their natural lives.

Children can grow up learning that compassion is not weakness, but strength.

And humanity can begin to heal its relationship with the natural world.

OUR SPIRITUAL RESPONSIBILITY

Across many spiritual traditions, humanity is taught that life has value and that we have responsibilities towards creation.

Genesis 1:29 tells us:

“Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed … and every tree … to you it shall be for meat.”

Whatever one’s religious interpretation, the message of nourishment from the plant world and humanity’s responsibility towards creation deserves reflection.

If we believe that life is created by God, then surely the suffering of God’s creatures should matter to us.

Do no harm.
Cause no unnecessary suffering.
Protect the vulnerable.

Be a guardian rather than an exploiter of creation.

THE LAW MUST PROTECT ANIMALS IN PRACTICE

The United Kingdom has animal-welfare legislation intended to protect animals from unnecessary suffering.

The Animal Welfare Act 2006 places duties upon those responsible for animals to safeguard their welfare.

The Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 provide requirements concerning the handling, restraint, stunning and killing of animals, including protections against avoidable pain, suffering and distress.

Where credible evidence raises concerns about the treatment of animals, those concerns should be investigated properly and independently, and the law should be enforced.

Animal welfare must never become merely words written on paper.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT HATING PEOPLE

This campaign is not a call for hatred towards farmers, slaughterhouse workers or anyone else.

It is a call for change.

Many people have inherited a system that has existed for generations. Change requires education, compassion, support and the courage to question what we have previously accepted.

We should not seek to destroy people’s livelihoods.

We should transform the system that makes a livelihood dependent upon killing.

WE CAN DO BETTER

We have the knowledge and resources to feed humanity without making the killing of sentient animals the foundation of our food system.

We can choose plant-based nourishment.

We can choose compassion.

We can choose sanctuary.

We can choose stewardship.

We can choose life.

PLEASE DON’T LOOK AWAY

If you watch footage from inside slaughterhouses, watch it with an open heart.

Look at the animals.

Look into their eyes.

See their fear.

See their vulnerability.

See their will to live.

Then ask yourself:

If we have the power to choose another way, why would we choose suffering?

The future does not have to repeat the past.

Let us move:
From exploitation to stewardship.
From violence to compassion.
From slaughter to sanctuary.
From ownership to guardianship.
From suffering to protection.

OUR VISION

A world where no animal is bred for slaughter.

A world where farmers are supported in creating sanctuaries and sustainable plant-based agriculture.

A world where sentient life is respected rather than commodified.

A world where compassion guides our choices.

A world where humanity finally understands that being guardians of creation carries a responsibility.

**CLOSE SLAUGHTERHOUSES.
CREATE SANCTUARIES.
PROTECT SENTIENT LIFE.**

The change begins when we are willing to see.

Please watch. Please listen. Please care. And please do not look away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDZWZILmdx8

All Rights Reserved.
Errors and Omission Excepted.

HARTSHEAD MEATS — WHY DOES THIS CONTINUE?

Behind every animal who enters a slaughterhouse is a living, feeling being — frightened, vulnerable and completely dependent upon human beings for protection.

The suffering endured by animals within the industrial farming and slaughter system cannot simply be dismissed as “business”. These are sentient lives.

The Directors of Hartshead Meats

The current directors publicly associated with Hartshead Meats are:

Richard John Henry Mullaney
Alan Mullaney
Nichola Jane Whitehead
Heather Louise Williams
Andrew James Hobson
Keith Jordan

The question we must ask is simple:
Why does this business continue?

Why, in a society that increasingly recognises that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing fear, pain and distress, do businesses whose purpose involves the slaughter of animals continue to operate?

Why are innocent animals still being brought into a system from which they will not leave alive?

And how long are we, as a society, going to accept this as normal?

This campaign is not about hatred towards individuals. It is about accountability, compassion and the animals themselves.

We believe the future of farming does not have to involve animal slaughter.

Farmers can be supported to transition away from killing animals and towards sanctuary-based, compassionate farming, where animals are allowed to live out their natural lives rather than being raised for death.

We ask Hartshead Meats — and society as a whole:

When will enough be enough?

When will we choose compassion over killing?

When will we close the slaughterhouses and create a future where animals are protected rather than processed?

Every person who stops, thinks, questions and shares creates another opportunity for compassion to grow.

Change begins when we are willing to question what society has accepted as normal.

The animals cannot speak for themselves.

So we must speak for them.

CLOSE ALL SLAUGHTERHOUSES.

LET FARMING BECOME SANCTUARIES.

LET COMPASSION BECOME THE FUTURE.

All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Aroa Merino Solicitor Category

Aroa Merino doing business as Solicitor agent for TLT Solicitors

Aroa Merino Solicitor, ,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

There is a formal and civil obligation to publish this public notice.

A Common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any wo/man can employ in order to obtain lawful remedy from the action of another wo/man who have – or attempted to- or have conspired to – damage said wo/man in some way. Such wrongs are known as ‘torts’ and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes ‘harassment’ such as ‘treats with menaces’, which is considered to be ‘psychological damage’, and also ‘defamation of character’ which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is very simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each man or woman has a Duty of Care to each other man or woman, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT, and constitutes a tort.

This is a notice of a formal and agreed lien by way of a remedy for the criminal offences by the Tortfeasor of (1)Trespass; (2) Identity theft; (3)Harassment; (4)A claim absent a lawfully binding contract; (5)Unlawful claim of ownership of my property; (6)Using my fiction without prior written permission; (7)Unlawful threat of legal action; (8) Unlawful use of my private property; (9) Breach of privacy; as well as damage of My immeasurable energy.

i, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright] have an Affidavit of Obligation – Security by way of a lien against, and therefore an interest in, the personal estate of Aroa Merino doing business as ASSISTANT SOLICITOR agent for TLT Solicitors, C/o One, Redcliffe Street,
Bristol, [BS1 6TP]

******************************************
NOTICE

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between Myself, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright], and the individual who accepts liability for the name Aroa Merino doing business as ASSISTANT SOLICITOR, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that i have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and My remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus i am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the sum certain of Twenty Three million Six Hundred Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Pounds Sterling, (£23,615,980.00).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

Record Location: Common Law Court CL/22/838286

End of Notice

All words are to be understood in their original definition as defined in English and outside any and all Legal definitions decreed by the Law Society.

All Rights Reserved

Errors and Omissions Excepted

Latest Posts in Banking Category

Jon Earle Sutton doing business as former CEO of Bank of Queensland Admits

Jon Earle Sutton

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Jon Earle Sutton”, at address “The Bank of Queensland
100 Skyring Terrace Newstead, Queensland 4006 ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$166,460,000.00 (one hundred and sixty six million, four hundred and sixty thousand AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
committed unconscionable conduct, perverted the course of justice, is in contempt of court by failing to comply with a court subpoena.

The Tortfeasor used unconscionable conduct with threats of repossession, when my property became under distress, although the Tortfeasor was insured to cover such an event and would have not suffered any loss. I was under pressure to sell my property with a real estate agent I was coerced into listing with and blackmailed into selling my marital home at a price well under its market value.

The Tortfeasor did not honour the subpoena; other documents concerning the overdraft facility were not submitted. All bank accounts are insured to cover for any misdemeanours of bank staff and any non payment of debt. There is no information on any of the documents to explain this or what corporation(s) has my details. I have no knowledge where my personal details have been given and for what purpose.
The Tortfeasor established other accounts that were withheld from the subpoena. Bank accounts were established with my account number, without my knowledge, when the line of credit was opened, which was secured by our marital home, this is fraud. As the conditions of the contract are not transparent the contract is void.

The Tortfeasor has agreed that all bank accounts associated with my name are my property. However, he has not given me access to them.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain and cause a loss to me by committing unconscionable conduct.

This is party to the property scam I found myself entwined in.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Brian Hartzer Category

BRIAN HARTZER doing business as former CEO OF WESTPAC BANKING GROUP ADMITS

Brian Hartzer

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Brian Hartzer”, at address “The Westpac Group, 275 Kent Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$181,440,000.00 (one hundred and eighty one million, four hundred and forty thousand AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an accessory after the fact, is in contempt of court and failed to comply with Queensland Legislation.

The Tortfeasor has in his possession withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents which is proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me, by his staff Ross Colqhoun,(Westpac) Debra Hartwaters (STG) and Lesley Harding (STG Browns Plains). As CEO of Westpace the Tortfeasor is responsible for their actions.

The Tortfeasor is in breach of Queensland Legislation by accepting invalid and incomplete General Power of Attorney, where signatures are to be witnessed in accordance with the Land Titles Act 1994 and Land Act 1994. The GPOA is un-witnessed therefore invalid and incomplete and to use this false document is both civil and criminal fraud.
The Tortfeasor has also accepted fraudulent bank account opening documents where my business partner has signed as having POA over me. There never was a POA and there are no documents to support this claim. The Tortfeasor has condoned this fraud and allowed the fraudulent bank account to be re-opened by Debra Hartwaters. The Tortfeasor is an accessory after the fact.

The Tortfeasor did not honour the subpoena; other documents concerning the fraudulent bank account were not submitted. All accounts are insured to cover for any misdemeanours of bank staff and any non payment of debt. There is no information on any of the documents to explain this or what corporation(s) has been given my details. I have no knowledge where my personal details have been given and for what purpose.

The Tortfeasor has agreed that all bank accounts associated with my name are my property. However, he has not given me access to any of them.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain and cause a loss to me by hiding the fraud committed against me, by not reporting the fraud the Tortfeasor has assisted in civil and criminal fraud.

This is party to the property scam I found myself entwined in.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Daniel Schwennicke - BARRISTER Category

Daniel Schwennicke doing business as BARRISTER

Daniel Schwennicke - BARRISTER, ,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

There is a formal and civil obligation to publish this public notice.

A Common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any wo/man can employ in order to obtain lawful remedy from the action of another wo/man who have – or attempted to- or have conspired to – damage said wo/man in some way. Such wrongs are known as ‘torts’ and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes ‘harassment’ such as ‘treats with menaces’, which is considered to be ‘psychological damage’, and also ‘defamation of character’ which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is very simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each man or woman has a Duty of Care to each other man or woman, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT, and constitutes a tort.

This is a notice of a formal and agreed lien by way of a remedy for the criminal offences by the Tortfeasor of: (1)Trespass; (2)Identity theft/fraud; (3)Harassment; (4) Being complicit to a claim absent a lawfully binding contract; (5)Unlawful claim of ownership of property; (6)Larceny; (7)Unlawful threat of legal action; (8) Use of My fiction/property without written permission (9) Breach of privacy; as well as damage of My immeasurable energy.

i, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright] have an Affidavit of Obligation – Security by way of a lien against, and therefore an interest in, the personal estate of Daniel Schwennicke doing business as BARRISTER, C/o Fountain Court Chambers, Middle Temple Ln, Temple, London [EC4Y 9DH]

******************************************
NOTICE

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between Myself, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright], and the individual who accepts liability for the name Daniel Schwennicke doing business as BARRISTER, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that i have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and My remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus i am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the sum certain of Twenty Three million Six Hundred Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Pounds Sterling, (£23,615,980.00).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

Record Location: Common Law Court CL/22/838281.

End of Notice

All words are to be understood in their original definition as defined in English and outside any and all Legal definitions decreed by the Law Society.

All Rights Reserved

Errors and Omissions Excepted

Latest Posts in Debra Hartwaters Category

St George Debra Hartwaters doing business as Customer Manager/Resolution Experience

Debra Hartwaters

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Debra Hartwaters”, at address “St George Bank, Kogarah, NSW 1485, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$17,280,000.00 (seventeen million, two hundred and eighty thousand, AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
in her possession St George business bank account documents showing criminal and civil fraud made against me and has accepted invalid and incomplete documents the other Director of my Company submitted. Conspired to commit fraud with the other Director of my Company and perverted the course of justice.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved

Latest Posts in Gavin Lai Category

Gavin Lai doing business as Senior Managing Solicitor

Gavin Lai,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Gavin Lai”, at address “Emerson Migration Lawyers, Level 8, Northpoint Building, 231 North Quay Brisbane Qld 4000. Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$18,849,800.00 (eighteen million, eight hundred and forty nine thousand and eight hundred AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, breached the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, conspired against me, was an accessory after the fact and has committed professional misconduct.

The Tortfeasor and his collegues, Myles Walker and Director of EMFL, Aishwarya Somal, withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents from me which was proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me, by Peter Gerard Joseph Brooks and Lesley Harding. The Tortfeasor conspired with the other side to keep this information from me and coerced me into an unfair property settlement.

The Tortfeasor refuses to put right his crimes of civil and criminal fraud, even though he conspired with the other side to keep the crimes hidden from me.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain or cause a loss to me by hiding the fraud committed against me. This was so that the other side could continue with the fraud of falsifying documents concerning the sale of my property.

The Tortfeasor, by not informing me of the civil and criminal crimes made against me, assisted with the property scam, where I was forced and blackmailed into selling my marital home for well under the market value. This is a criminal syndicate which includes bankers, valuers, REIQ members and judiciaries, where they use the corrupt family law courts with the corrupt family law judge, who plays a major role in gaining properties for well under market value. The perpetrators take advantage of the collapse of the family unit, by means of threatening court action and extortionate fees if I did not agree to an unfair settlement and sale of my marital home at the price the perpetrators dictate.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved

Latest Posts in Ian Narev Category

Ian Narev former CEO of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia

Ian Narev

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Ian Narev”, at address “The Commonwealth Bank of Australia Tower 1 Grd Floor 201 Sussex Street Sydney, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$181,440,000 (one hundred and eighty one million, four hundred and forty thousand. AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor:
Is the former CEO of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia and has assisted criminal and civil fraud, changed the structure of my business, not submitted subpoenaed material, withheld evidence, perverted the course of justice, committed contempt of court.
The Tortfeasor has breached Queensland legislation concerning the signing of General Power of Attorney. Signatures are required to be witnessed in accordance with the Land Titles Act 1994 and Land Act 1994 for the document to be valid for use in Australia. The GPOA had no signatures witnessed, which meant it was incomplete therefore invalid and if used is both civil and criminal fraud.
The Tortfeasor has accepted the incomplete and invalid General POA, which was used to change the merchant facility from my original business bank to the fraudulent STG bank account.
The Tortfeasor also removed me from our joint Commbiz account without my knowledge or permission, this meant that I was unable to access any of my joint personal and business accounts, through Commbiz.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Jeffery Bunning Category

Jeffery Bunning doing business as family law barrister admits

Jeffery Bunning

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Jeffery Bunning”, at address “Level 15, Innes of Court, 107 North Quay, Brisbane City QLD 4000, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is $151,360,160.00. (one hundred and fifty one million three hundred and sixty thousand one hundred and sixty dollars).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor:
did not act ethically , has assisted civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an accessory after the fact, is in breach of Queensland legislation, in breach of Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, has committed serious professional misconduct and is unfit for duty.

The Tortfeasor conspired with Ross Hirst, my ex husband’s family lawyer, and my solicitor Gavin Lai into pressuring me to agree to an unfair property settlement. The Tortfeasor explained that if I didn’t agree to the offer, my case would go to court and the judge could take up to twelve months to make a decision and give the other side 75% of our property and costs against me of approximately $35k.

The Tortfeasor failed to explain to me that the General POA which my ex husband submitted to the ST George bank staff, was invalid and incomplete and to use it would be both civil and criminal fraud.

The Tortfeasor assisted in hiding the St George fraudulent bank account opening documents, which I subpoenaed. I was unaware documents were withheld from me by Myles Walker, Gavin Lai, Peter Brooks and his solicitor, Ross Hirst and Judge Baumann. This was so that Peter Brooks would not be reported for his crimes against me. This has perverted the course of justice and has assisted criminal and civil fraud.

The Tortfeasor was my family law barrister, has conspired to keep me ignorant of the crimes committed against me.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Jon Earle Sutton Category

Jon Earle Sutton doing business as former CEO of Bank of Queensland Admits

Jon Earle Sutton

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Jon Earle Sutton”, at address “The Bank of Queensland
100 Skyring Terrace Newstead, Queensland 4006 ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$166,460,000.00 (one hundred and sixty six million, four hundred and sixty thousand AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
committed unconscionable conduct, perverted the course of justice, is in contempt of court by failing to comply with a court subpoena.

The Tortfeasor used unconscionable conduct with threats of repossession, when my property became under distress, although the Tortfeasor was insured to cover such an event and would have not suffered any loss. I was under pressure to sell my property with a real estate agent I was coerced into listing with and blackmailed into selling my marital home at a price well under its market value.

The Tortfeasor did not honour the subpoena; other documents concerning the overdraft facility were not submitted. All bank accounts are insured to cover for any misdemeanours of bank staff and any non payment of debt. There is no information on any of the documents to explain this or what corporation(s) has my details. I have no knowledge where my personal details have been given and for what purpose.
The Tortfeasor established other accounts that were withheld from the subpoena. Bank accounts were established with my account number, without my knowledge, when the line of credit was opened, which was secured by our marital home, this is fraud. As the conditions of the contract are not transparent the contract is void.

The Tortfeasor has agreed that all bank accounts associated with my name are my property. However, he has not given me access to them.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain and cause a loss to me by committing unconscionable conduct.

This is party to the property scam I found myself entwined in.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in legal matters Category

Aroa Merino doing business as Solicitor agent for TLT Solicitors

Aroa Merino Solicitor, ,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

There is a formal and civil obligation to publish this public notice.

A Common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any wo/man can employ in order to obtain lawful remedy from the action of another wo/man who have – or attempted to- or have conspired to – damage said wo/man in some way. Such wrongs are known as ‘torts’ and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes ‘harassment’ such as ‘treats with menaces’, which is considered to be ‘psychological damage’, and also ‘defamation of character’ which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is very simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each man or woman has a Duty of Care to each other man or woman, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT, and constitutes a tort.

This is a notice of a formal and agreed lien by way of a remedy for the criminal offences by the Tortfeasor of (1)Trespass; (2) Identity theft; (3)Harassment; (4)A claim absent a lawfully binding contract; (5)Unlawful claim of ownership of my property; (6)Using my fiction without prior written permission; (7)Unlawful threat of legal action; (8) Unlawful use of my private property; (9) Breach of privacy; as well as damage of My immeasurable energy.

i, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright] have an Affidavit of Obligation – Security by way of a lien against, and therefore an interest in, the personal estate of Aroa Merino doing business as ASSISTANT SOLICITOR agent for TLT Solicitors, C/o One, Redcliffe Street,
Bristol, [BS1 6TP]

******************************************
NOTICE

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between Myself, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright], and the individual who accepts liability for the name Aroa Merino doing business as ASSISTANT SOLICITOR, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that i have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and My remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus i am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the sum certain of Twenty Three million Six Hundred Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Pounds Sterling, (£23,615,980.00).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

Record Location: Common Law Court CL/22/838286

End of Notice

All words are to be understood in their original definition as defined in English and outside any and all Legal definitions decreed by the Law Society.

All Rights Reserved

Errors and Omissions Excepted

Latest Posts in Michael Baumann Category

Michael Baumann doing business as Family Law Court Judge in Brisbane Admits

Michael Baumann

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Michael Baumann”, at address “Harry Gibbs Commonwealth Law Courts Building, 119 North Quay, Brisbane Qld 4000, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is $373,120,160.00. (three hundred and seventy three million, one hundred and twenty thousand, one hundred and sixty dollars).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor:
did not act ethically, has assisted civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an accessory after the fact, is in breach of Queensland legislation, has committed serious professional misconduct and is unfit for duty.

The Tortfeasor conspired with Ross Hirst, my ex husband’s family lawyer, and my EMFL solicitor Gavin Lai and Jeffery Bunning into pressuring me to agree to an unfair settlement. The Tortfeasor was complicit with the threatening actions of Jeffery Bunning who explained that if I didn’t agree to the settlement, my case would go to court and the judge could take up to twelve months to make a decision and give the other side 75% of our property and costs against me of approximately $35k.

The Tortfeasor failed to explain to me that the General POA, was invalid and incomplete and to use it would be both civil and criminal fraud. This was used to establish fraudulent business bank accounts with the ST George bank.

The Tortfeasor did not report the criminal and civil fraud of the STG bankers and my ex-husband.
I explained to him with an affidavit and evidence, that my ex had signed on my behalf, as having POA over me to establish the fraudulent STG bank. As a judge he is duty bound to report any crimes where there is a penalty of over 5 years imprisonment.

The Tortfeasor withheld the subpoenaed St George fraudulent bank account opening documents from me and colluded with Myles Walker, Gavin Lai, Peter Brooks and his solicitor, Ross Hirst and Jeffery Bunning, to keep this information from me. This was so that Peter Brooks would not be reported for his crimes against me. This has perverted the course of justice and has assisted criminal and civil fraud.

The Tortfeasor was then complicit with the forced sale of my property which I was blackmailed, by Ross Hirst, into agreeing to sell for well under the market value. If I didn’t agree I would be taken back to court and charged fees of $5k.
The contract of sale was invalid, my signature was required to be witnessed by an Australian Lawyer or other authorised official. The Tortfeaseor was well aware I was outside Australia when this contract was forced on to me to sign.

The Tortfeasor refused to issue orders that I could collect the remainder of my personal possessions. I explained to him that my ex husband refused to give them to me and attacked me, when I went to my house following court orders. The Tortfeasor has assisted in the theft of my personal items.

The Tortfeasor was bias towards my ex husband and his family law solicitor, therefore should have stood down to allow another judge to take my case. This was because he was involved in the sale of my marital home. Due to the favouritism and deceit, the Tortfeasor’s orders were invalid and unenforceable.

The Tortfeasor is party to a property scam, where the perpertrators take advantage of family distress to force the sale of the property at a price the perpertrators, demand. Real estate agents, family lawyers, bankers, valuers were all complicit with the Tortfeasor, who is one of the worst actors I have ever seen.

All corporations have been foreclosed since 2013, therefore, this Tortfeasor has acted on his own volition and has no authority over any individual – his orders are un-enforceable.

End of Notice
All rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Myles Walker Category

Myles Walker doing business as Senior Associate Family Lawyer

Myles Walker

Myles Walker (1)

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Myles Walker”, at address “Pullos Lawyers Level 3, Southport Central Building G27 Garden Street Southport Qld 4215. Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$15,862,880.00 (fifteen million, eight hundred and sixty two thousand, eight hundred and eighty AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, breached the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, conspired against me, was negligent and has engaged in professional misconduct.

The Tortfeasor withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents from me which was proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me. He conspired with the other side to keep this information from me and colluded with his colleagues at Emerson Family Law, Brisbane, to force me into an unfair property settlement.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved

Latest Posts in Peter G J Brooks Category

Peter G J Brooks admits

Peter G J Brooks

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Peter Gerard Joseph Brooks”, at address “CivForce Traffic Management, 49 Chetwynd St Loganholm, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$6,125,720.00 (six million, one hundred and twenty five thousand seven hundred and twenty AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has: Committed criminal and civil fraud, Company embezzlement, perverted the course of justice, assault and conspired to commit fraud and theft of my property.
The Tortfeasor signed as having power of attorney over me, when one does not and never has existed. Then he established a business bank account with the St George bank, and Lesley Harding of the STG bank accepted this claim without confirming this with me.
The Tortfeasor submitted an incomplete and invalid General POA which Lesley Harding at the STG bank also accepted and should have made the relevant checks to see if the documents were correct. to use this false document is both civil and criminal fraud.
The Tortfeasor moved our original banking facility from the CBA to his fraudulent STG bank account which meant that I was unable to have access to my business banking.
The Tortfeasor and his Brisbane family law solicitor Ross Hirst, my Brisbane solicitors Myles Walker from Emerson Family Law and my barrister kept the subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank account opening documents from me.
The Tortfeasor refused to give me my personal possessions some of which he allowed his friend to take away when she was staying in my house without my knowledge. This is theft and has deprived me my rightful ownership.
The Tortfeasor attacked me and tried to throw me across the room, in front of our son, when I went to collect my personal possessions. I was following court orders.
The Tortfeasor, his solicitor and real estate agent Karen Murphy,from Real Property Vibe, Beenleigh, conspired together to force me into believing the contract of sale for our property was valid and enforceable. As I was outside Australia at the time of signing, the document required my signature to be witnessed by an Australian lawyer or Notary or other authorised official.
This meant that the contact was invalid. Our conveyancing solicitor Adam Prior from Certus Legal did not explain this to me. This is property theft and deception.
The Tortfeasor, his solicitor and Karen Murphy, from Real Property Vibe, Beenleigh, pressured me into agreeing to sell our property well below market value.
The Tortfeasor has not adhered to the court orders he agreed, by not giving me my share of our company assets, my personal belongings and funds that were in our joint business account.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Property Category

Animal World

Animal Farming, Property

CLOSE SLAUGHTERHOUSES — CREATE SANCTUARIES
A Call for Compassion, Conscience and a New Relationship with Animals

We are calling for a fundamental change in the way humanity treats sentient life.

I recently watched footage of the slaughter of young cattle. What I witnessed was profoundly distressing: vulnerable, sentient animals experiencing fear, distress and suffering in an environment from which they had no possibility of escape.

These were not objects.

They were living beings.

They felt fear.
They felt pain.
They wanted to live.

And yet we have created a system in which their lives can become a means of production and profit, before ending in slaughter.

WE MUST ASK OURSELVES: IS THIS WHO WE WANT TO BE?

A society should be judged not only by how it treats the powerful, but by how it treats those who are completely dependent upon its protection.

Animals placed into human care trust us to protect them.

If we say that we love animals, yet ultimately send them to slaughter, we must have the courage to examine that contradiction.

There is another way.

FROM FARMS TO SANCTUARIES

We should begin creating a genuine pathway for farmers to transition away from animal slaughter and towards sanctuary farming, plant-based agriculture and compassionate land stewardship.

Farmers should be supported—not abandoned—to make this transition.

Land can produce food without requiring animals to be raised and killed.

Farms can become sanctuaries.

Animals can be allowed to live out their natural lives.

Children can grow up learning that compassion is not weakness, but strength.

And humanity can begin to heal its relationship with the natural world.

OUR SPIRITUAL RESPONSIBILITY

Across many spiritual traditions, humanity is taught that life has value and that we have responsibilities towards creation.

Genesis 1:29 tells us:

“Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed … and every tree … to you it shall be for meat.”

Whatever one’s religious interpretation, the message of nourishment from the plant world and humanity’s responsibility towards creation deserves reflection.

If we believe that life is created by God, then surely the suffering of God’s creatures should matter to us.

Do no harm.
Cause no unnecessary suffering.
Protect the vulnerable.

Be a guardian rather than an exploiter of creation.

THE LAW MUST PROTECT ANIMALS IN PRACTICE

The United Kingdom has animal-welfare legislation intended to protect animals from unnecessary suffering.

The Animal Welfare Act 2006 places duties upon those responsible for animals to safeguard their welfare.

The Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 provide requirements concerning the handling, restraint, stunning and killing of animals, including protections against avoidable pain, suffering and distress.

Where credible evidence raises concerns about the treatment of animals, those concerns should be investigated properly and independently, and the law should be enforced.

Animal welfare must never become merely words written on paper.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT HATING PEOPLE

This campaign is not a call for hatred towards farmers, slaughterhouse workers or anyone else.

It is a call for change.

Many people have inherited a system that has existed for generations. Change requires education, compassion, support and the courage to question what we have previously accepted.

We should not seek to destroy people’s livelihoods.

We should transform the system that makes a livelihood dependent upon killing.

WE CAN DO BETTER

We have the knowledge and resources to feed humanity without making the killing of sentient animals the foundation of our food system.

We can choose plant-based nourishment.

We can choose compassion.

We can choose sanctuary.

We can choose stewardship.

We can choose life.

PLEASE DON’T LOOK AWAY

If you watch footage from inside slaughterhouses, watch it with an open heart.

Look at the animals.

Look into their eyes.

See their fear.

See their vulnerability.

See their will to live.

Then ask yourself:

If we have the power to choose another way, why would we choose suffering?

The future does not have to repeat the past.

Let us move:
From exploitation to stewardship.
From violence to compassion.
From slaughter to sanctuary.
From ownership to guardianship.
From suffering to protection.

OUR VISION

A world where no animal is bred for slaughter.

A world where farmers are supported in creating sanctuaries and sustainable plant-based agriculture.

A world where sentient life is respected rather than commodified.

A world where compassion guides our choices.

A world where humanity finally understands that being guardians of creation carries a responsibility.

**CLOSE SLAUGHTERHOUSES.
CREATE SANCTUARIES.
PROTECT SENTIENT LIFE.**

The change begins when we are willing to see.

Please watch. Please listen. Please care. And please do not look away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDZWZILmdx8

All Rights Reserved.
Errors and Omission Excepted.

HARTSHEAD MEATS — WHY DOES THIS CONTINUE?

Behind every animal who enters a slaughterhouse is a living, feeling being — frightened, vulnerable and completely dependent upon human beings for protection.

The suffering endured by animals within the industrial farming and slaughter system cannot simply be dismissed as “business”. These are sentient lives.

The Directors of Hartshead Meats

The current directors publicly associated with Hartshead Meats are:

Richard John Henry Mullaney
Alan Mullaney
Nichola Jane Whitehead
Heather Louise Williams
Andrew James Hobson
Keith Jordan

The question we must ask is simple:
Why does this business continue?

Why, in a society that increasingly recognises that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing fear, pain and distress, do businesses whose purpose involves the slaughter of animals continue to operate?

Why are innocent animals still being brought into a system from which they will not leave alive?

And how long are we, as a society, going to accept this as normal?

This campaign is not about hatred towards individuals. It is about accountability, compassion and the animals themselves.

We believe the future of farming does not have to involve animal slaughter.

Farmers can be supported to transition away from killing animals and towards sanctuary-based, compassionate farming, where animals are allowed to live out their natural lives rather than being raised for death.

We ask Hartshead Meats — and society as a whole:

When will enough be enough?

When will we choose compassion over killing?

When will we close the slaughterhouses and create a future where animals are protected rather than processed?

Every person who stops, thinks, questions and shares creates another opportunity for compassion to grow.

Change begins when we are willing to question what society has accepted as normal.

The animals cannot speak for themselves.

So we must speak for them.

CLOSE ALL SLAUGHTERHOUSES.

LET FARMING BECOME SANCTUARIES.

LET COMPASSION BECOME THE FUTURE.

All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in Random Category

Latest Posts in Ross Colquhoun of Westpac Category

Ross Colquhoun dba Customer Manager Customer Resolution and Experience Westpac

Ross Colquhoun of Westpac

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Ross Colquhoun”, at address “Westpac Banking Corporation, Level 1, 4-16 Montgomery Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217 Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$17,280,000.00 (seventeen million, two hundred and eighty thousand, AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
assisted in criminal and civil fraud, perverted the course of justice has in his possession St George business bank account documents showing criminal and civil fraud made against me and has accepted invalid and incomplete documents the other Director of my Company submitted.

End of Notice
All rights reserved.

Latest Posts in Ross Hirst Category

Ross Hirst doing business as Principal of Hirst and Co Family Lawyers, Brisbane

Ross Hirst

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Ross Hirst”, at address “Hirst and Co Family Lawyers, Level 2/247 Adelaide St, Brisbane City QLD 4000, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is $151,360,160.00. (one hundred and fifty one million three hundred and sixty thousand one hundred and sixty dollars).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
assisted civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an instigator in a property scam, is in breach of Queensland legislation, in breach of Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, has committed serious professional misconduct and is unfit for duty.
The Tortfeasor conspired with staff at the St. George bank, my legal team, Myles Walker, Gavin Lai, my barrister Jeffery Bunning and Judge Michael Baumann, to keep the fraudulent bank account opening documents from me. This meant that I was unaware of the extent of fraud committed against me and the respondent’s client, Peter Brooks, was not reported for his crimes.
The Tortfeasor interfered with the listing and sale of my marital home, by conspiring with Peter Brooks and Karen Murphy from Real Property Vibe, to coerce me into selling my marital home to the buyers for well below market value. The Tortfeasor was aware I was outside Australia and emailed me with instructions, threatened me with enforcing court orders and charge me costs of $5000. The respondent deceived me into believing the contract of sale was valid. My signature was not witnessed according to Queensland legislation, on the listing document or the contract of sale, therefore the documents are invalid and were not enforceable. The Tortfeasor conspired with Karen Murphy and my conveyancing solicitor, Adam Prior and kept this information from me.
The Tortfeasor, by not informing me of the civil and criminal crimes made against me, assisted with the property scam, where I was threatened with legal action and blackmailed into selling my marital home for well under the market value.

This is a criminal syndicate which includes bankers, valuers, REIQ members and judiciaries, where they use the corrupt family law courts with the corrupt family law judge, who plays a major role in gaining properties for well under market value. The predators take advantage of the collapse of the family unit, by means of threatening court action and extortionate fees if I did not agree to an unfair settlement and sale of my marital home at the price the Tortfeasor dictated.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved.

Latest Posts in TAKE NOTICE Category

NOTICE OF LIABILITY

TAKE NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE

I hereby put you on notice Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, or as is also made known to the realm, Alexandra Elizabeth Mary, as the claimed holder of the Office of British monarch, and all your claimed offspring and subordinates including Charles Philip Arthur George, the holder of the Title the Prince of Wales and William Arthur Philip Louis holder of the Title The Duke of Cambridge, including any and all derivatives of such names as liable for the following encroachment against the common law of the land, not to be mistaken for the English Common Law.

I, jacqueline, a flesh and blood woman as derived from the word of god, hereby put you on notice for the liability of limiting my capacity to trade and for demanding I stand under house arrest.

It is my understanding your intention is to enforce medical interventions through your subordinate officers and agents upon I which is an unlawful burden for which you are also liable.

In respect of the above you are clearly making an encroachment upon the territory, rights, individual liberties, an intrusion into, an invasion of, infiltration of, all afforded rights as derived from the word of god, which is a clear trespass upon I and my property which includes my conjugal partner and to my offspring, each of which are my property.

You have and continue to make a gradual advance beyond the usual and acceptable limits.

The only acceptable remedy is to cease in all matters pertaining to the above breech of encroachment.

Definitions:
The history behind encroach is likely to hook you in. First appearing in English in the 16th century, the word derives from the Middle English encrochen, which means to get or seize.

Source Merriam-Webster.

All words are to be understood in their original definition as defined in law and outside any and all Legal definitions decreed by the Law Society.

Autograph by: :jacqueline:

Dated this 24th day of the month of April, A.D. 2020

In care of :

somewhere on the land

Non Domestic  Non Resident   Non Commercial

© Copyright 2026  | This Is My Story – Lies of the Corporations  |  XML Sitemap |  Sitemap